Voting Is Treason: Outrageous Headline Or A Call For Patriotism
A claim that voting is treason may be looked at as an outrageous headline, either to be ignored for its absurdity or further researched for a better understanding. Well, before you make a snap judgment, please consider the issues that follow.
If the government passes a law which you believe violates the Constitution, will you obey that law?
No? That's a good thing. And if tomorrow the federal government created a new state government for your state that disenfranchised a large percentage of those in your state, and then they created a new class of citizen, both actions being violations of our dear Constitution -- Would you become one of those citizens and vote in that government? Or would you still disobey everything which came after and refuse to take part in the treason?
If you refused to participate, again, that's a good thing. You wouldn't want to be a party to treason. You would want to be loyal to the Constitution and only to a lawful and consensual government.
And what if I told you all of the above already happened; that this is indeed a case presented against America's 39th Congress and precisely what they did with the Reconstruction Acts of 1867/68, and the unlawful coercing of the Fourteenth Amendment?
Did you know that there is no statute of limitations on violations against our Constitution? Does this shed new light on our current condition? Does it shed new light on Election Day?
For several years now we have promoted the idea that "voting is not the answer". The usual response is, "well then, what IS the answer?" The key is in the statement itself. Voting is not the answer *to violations of the Constitution* because violations which allegedly create legislation or entire systems of government are in fact not laws at all, and maybe freely ignored. Take a look at what the U.S. Supreme Court says.
"An unconstitutional act is not a law. It confers no rights. It imposes no duties. It affords no protection. It creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Therefore an unconstitutional act purporting to create an office gives no validity to the acts of a person acting under color of its authority."
~Norton v. Shelby County, 6 S.Ct. 1121
~Norton v. Shelby County, 6 S.Ct. 1121
Many of us today claim that if some horrendous event were to happen tomorrow which destroys our Constitution (the actions of a new president, for example...hint hint), then we will not comply. But what if that event already occurred?
The following is a shortlist of violations against our Constitution perpetrated by the Reconstruction Acts:
Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution states that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them aid and comfort...” The 39th Congress’ defiance of the original object of the War was, in fact, a new war upon the States, our founding principles and the Constitution. Reconstruction and its maintenance, therefore, is nothing less than statutized treason.
Article 4, Section 3, Clause 1 states that “...no new states shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any other state...” As a result of Reconstruction, a new state called North Carolina was erected within the same jurisdiction as the old state, while the original body politic was still lawfully operating.
Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution states that “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". The constitution of every State also expressly forbids bills of attainder. A bill of attainder is an act of a legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without the benefit of a judicial trial. In total violation of this concept, section 5 of the first Reconstruction Act stated that all who participated in the rebellion were to be disfranchised.
Article 4 states, “The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;...” When Congress changed the body politic, putting the new state in place, this was NOT guaranteeing a republican form of government to the community of free citizens of the original state.
Article 5 of the Constitution states, “The Congress,...shall propose amendments to this Constitution,...provided that ...no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.” In contradiction to Article 5, original states which participated in the war were not allowed to vote in the U.S. Senate during the proposal of the 14th Amendment, though they were in fact states which had participated in the amending of the Constitution with the 13th Amendment to abolish slavery.
The 5th Amendment makes these statements, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime....nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...” The Reconstruction Acts declared an entire body of people to be guilty; not allowing them to have their own form of government unless they first adopted the 14th Amendment. This is a total violation of the due process law that is represented in this 5th Amendment.
These violations annulled existing states during times of peace, disenfranchising, through illegal Bills of Attainder, a large percentage of those in the states, and creating new states (both body politics and government) for a new national class of citizen who would be loyal to and receive benefits from a national form of government. Federalist 39 was of course very clear on the stance that our form of government was not intended to be national, but instead that we were intended to be a federal Union, having a very LIMITED federal government.
“Each State, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, then, the new Constitution will if established, be a federal, and not a national constitution." - Federalist 39
Federalist 39 continues to explain what a national government looks like, in order to clarify that the new Constitution did not fall under this definition.
“The idea of a national government involves in it, not only an authority over the individual citizens, but an indefinite supremacy over all persons and things [...] Among a people consolidated into one nation, this supremacy is completely vested in the national legislature. [...] In this relation, then, the proposed government cannot be deemed a national one; since its jurisdiction extends to certain enumerated objects only.” - Federalist 39
Today, we find ourselves directly in the midst of the "indefinite supremacy over all persons and things" spoken of by Federalist 39. The very national U.S. Citizens rage against one another over a decision for an office originally given charge of but a few enumerated powers, but which now exercises dominion such that the elected's opinions can divide an entire country down the middle.
So, is our goal to get everyone to stop voting? No. Keep up the pressure on the occupiers. However, we must develop a second track. A NEW track. We should begin to recognize that that great horrendous event against our Constitution has, in fact, already happened and that our duty to stand on what was before has been our duty for quite some time now. A duty which, to this point, WE the people have been neglecting. In short, we support abstaining the vote only when such abstinence means that you will now be actively promoting, participating in, and supporting lawful government.
Friends, I leave you with this thought on today, Election Day. It's time to re-establish the states.
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)
"FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY"
and is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, In God we trust
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy
Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
NEVER FORGET THE SACRIFICES
BY OUR VETERANS
Note: We at The Patriot cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest, Twitter, Tumblr, Me We and PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
LibertygroupFreedom 
The Patriot is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to Educate, protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
WE THE PEOPLE
TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!
TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Help us spread the word about THE PATRIOT Blog we're reaching millions help us reach millions more.
Help us spread the word about THE PATRIOT Blog we're reaching millions help us reach millions more.
Please SHARE this now! The Crooked Liberal Media will hide and distort the truth. It’s up to us, Trump social media warriors, to get the truth out. If we don’t, no one will!
Share this story on Facebook and let us know because we want to hear YOUR voice!
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈
Share this story on Facebook and let us know because we want to hear YOUR voice!
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
❦❧❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦❧❦
For you see, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.
Coningsby: Or The New Generation And, The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings, and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. — Benjamin Disraeli, Speech at Aylesbury, Great Britain, September 10, 1870
◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈ ◈
No comments:
Post a Comment