Pages Of Interest

Friday, November 13, 2020

LET'S TALK ABOUT JUSTICE: Is There Really Justice for All?

 


NO, MY FELLOW AMERICANS I DON'T BELIEVE THERE IS.  I BELIEVE THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT SIDES, ONE FOR THE AVERAGE CITIZEN AND ONE FOR THE ELITE PEOPLE OF OUR COUNTRY OR POLITICALLY CORRECT. BIDEN SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT, THEY KNEW HE WAS DIRTY AND WHAT ABOUT HILLARY SHE WAS GUILTY AS SIN NOT TO MENTION OBAMA AND HIS IRAN DEAL. "IN GOD WE TRUST "ALL OTHERS NEED TO PAY THE PRICE.

JUSTICE FOR ALL, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE!


For example, if we see someone who is charged with governing others—whether a senator, a mayor, or even a homeowners association president—allow favored members of the community to get by without following rules, or, worse still, make rules designed to hurt those they disfavor, we should question the justice of this.

Even if we turn out to be mistaken, citizens must be willing to ask such questions, if only to remind ourselves—and our elected officials—that equal treatment before the law is essential to freedom.

AND WHERE DOES IT STOP? - HERE WITH YOU, MY FELLOW AMERICANS WWW.AUAT.ORG

Interior of an American courtroom

Is There Really Justice for All?

The makeup of the judiciary doesn’t match the makeup of the country, and this could lead to bias.

IT'S A PERVASIVE NOTION in American society: Justice is blind, fairly administered, and equal to all.

But a new Center for American Progress report says that a lack of diversity among the nation's judiciary is hindering fairness and the image of equality in the U.S. justice system – particularly in jurisdictions where judges are elected instead of politically appointed.

"While the role of the federal judiciary and the decisions it metes out are often examined, far less focus and study is directed to the role of state courts and their impact and influence on ordinary citizens," where issues ranging from divorce and criminal prosecutions to voting rights can be established, according to the report. "Even less is known about who sits on these courts and their backgrounds, both personal and professional."


Though all are supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law, some communities "are forced to wrestle with the fact that their judicial benches are filled with people who are not representative of their constituents," according to the report. "In many states, the judges do not look like the defendants and plaintiffs who stand in front of them," a glaring lack of diversity that calls into question the overall fairness of our justice system and could lead to implicit bias – subconscious negative feelings towards someone of a different race.
Meanwhile, according to the report, there are 340 state-level supreme court justices, but "relevant information about their backgrounds is lacking." It also notes that a 2009 study from the American Judiciary Society found that only 10 percent of state supreme court justices are nonwhite.
The principal issue is money, according to the report.
Though some minority bar associations and attorneys of color argued the open process gives them a fairer shot at reaching the bench than political appointments, black and Latino candidates have a hard time winning elections and keeping seats.
The numbers tell the story: Since 2000, white judges had a 90 percent reelection rate compared with African Americans (80 percent) and Latinos (67 percent), the report says. At the same time, minority judges who were appointed to elected seats were usually voted off the bench in the subsequent election, and minority candidates, in general, were less likely to raise as much money as their white competitors.
If you thought Wednesday night's CNBC-sponsored Republican presidential debate in Boulder, Colorado, was a snooze-fest, you're not alone, at least according to Twitter. The data analytics firm Amobee Brand Intelligence reports that there were roughly a third as many tweets on the dustup in Boulder (1,804,635) as there were for the slugfest at the Reagan Library (3,976,335) last month. Less surprising, perhaps, was the Twitter winner: Donald Trump, who generated around 201,000 Tweets during the debate's two-hour running time. But Sen. Ted Cruz was hot on his heels with 200,000 Twitterverse comments on the night.

Strange Bedfellows

Given the partisan nature of the Boulder debate, another surprising Twitter factoid emerged: The conservatives on stage found common ground with some prominent liberal comedians, including Bill Maher, Dane Cook, and Patton Oswalt. The social-media comity wasn't on the issues, though; left and right united in their hatred of CNBC moderators John Harwood, Carl Quintanilla, and Becky Quick. When Ted Cruz unloaded on the trio for asking what he thought were irrelevant questions ("Donald Trump, are you a comic-book villain? Ben Carson, can you do math? John Kasich, will you insult two people over here? Marco Rubio, why don't you resign? Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?" Cruz thundered), Oswalt set aside partisanship and chimed in on Twitter: "I hate Ted Cruz with the power of a million chainsaws revving but I agree with everything he just said. #GOPDebate."

Tripping Up Carson

One last Twitter debate datapoint may give Ben Carson a little heartburn, especially after the dispute over his relationship with Mannatech, a nutritional supplement company with products of questionable effectiveness – so much so that in 2009 they paid a $7 million deceptive-claims settlement in Texas. Though Carson says he was only marginally involved with the brand and sat on the board a time or two, several reports emerged Thursday that showed the good doctor's ties with the company go much deeper – including an endorsement video that's still available online. Amobee also reports that between September and October of this year, nearly 60 percent of all digital content activity around Mannatech was also related to Carson and his campaign.

Source:



PA JUDGE SIDES WITH TRUMP AGAINST SEC. OF STATE

In breaking news Thursday, Pennsylvania Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt has ruled in favor of President Trump’s campaign, saying that the secretary of state, Kathy Boockvar, overstepped her authority when, two days before Election Day, she extended the deadline for ID to be submitted to qualify mail-in ballots. Details from THE EPOCH TIMES are at the link.

I believe this issue is what Justice Sam Alito’s ruling about Pennsylvania keeping and counting ballots separately applied to. Judge Leavitt has now ruled that “...Respondents’ County Board of Elections are rejoined from counting any ballots that have been segregated pursuant to...this court’s order." (That means those votes are not to be counted.) We don’t know how many votes that is.

This decision can be appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

But if it is, that’s where it really gets complicated. I see that Trump’s campaign is also anticipating a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court on whether the PENNSYLVANIA Supreme Court acted legally in granting a different extension concerning ballots. Now, I’m not a lawyer, but something about this jumps out at me, and I wonder if you feel similarly jumped-at.

If the case Judge Leavitt ruled on is appealed at the state level, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court looks on track to be ruling on something very close to what they themselves did --- changing an election deadline --- which, in turn, might end up being ruled on in the Supreme Court. It sounds so crazy that I wonder if I’m just seeing this wrong.

Gosh, it’s at times like this when we really value our legal experts. We’ll try to unravel all this for you soon!


SOROS INFECTS BIDEN'S SO-CALLED "TRANSITION"

It’s easy to see why socialist billionaire George Soros poured $70 million into “election activity backing Biden’s candidacy,” as the WASHINGTON FREE BEACON reported on Wednesday. Joe Biden, “playing President,” has staffed his “Agency Review Teams” for his (unofficial) “transition” with people connected with and/or funded by Soros’ Open Society Foundation.

(By the way, the term “socialist billionaire” should be an oxymoron, but it’s not.)

During this election cycle, Soros spent over three times more than he did in 2016. As we’ve often said, when wealthy people give millions of their precious dollars to political campaigns and/or parties, they expect a return on their investment. In this case, Soros already had enormous access to the Democrat Party; now he plans to increase his influence within the actual halls of power. We expect more revelations about the Soros connection, though most of the media will strain their necks looking the other way.

SCHLICHTER ON GEORGIA RACES

Kurt Schlichter, who is a savvy political attorney as well as a hilarious columnist, lays out the necessary game plan Republicans need to start following right now to prevent the two Georgia Senate seats from being stolen in January.

IT AIN'T OVER

Issues & Insights reminds us that despite the media declaring Joe Biden President-elect, that isn’t their call. In fact, if North Carolina is included for Trump, Trump leads Biden 232-226 in confirmed electoral votes, and in the seven remaining states, there are numerous issues and allegations under investigation. In all of those states except Nevada, the state legislatures that have the final say over resolving disputes and fraud allegations have strong Republican majorities.

In short, it ain’t over ‘till it’s over, so quit measuring the Oval Office drapes, Joe.

MORE PORTLAND LUNACY

Protection For Me But Not For Thee: This story might have been invented by a conservative as a fable about self-righteous, over-privileged leftists. Portland City Commissioner Jo Ann Hardesty, who’s been pushing to defund the police and claiming too many unnecessary calls are made to 911, called 911 herself, repeatedly, to report her Lyft driver. When police arrived, they couldn't believe what she'd called them for.

She’s trying to claim racism and potential danger to her because she’s a well-known political figure. But the Lyft driver says he ended the ride because she was being rude and abusive to him. He says he didn’t even know who she was; she was just a passenger who went ballistic because he wouldn't close the window all the way due to COVID safety rules.

I'm surprised she didn't call 911 and demand that the police fan the virus away from her.

GEORGIA, GEORGIA, GEORGIA

The Democrats’ only hope of capturing the Senate is to win the two Georgia runoffs in January, which would give them a 50-50 tie broken by Kamala Harris if she becomes Vice President. The Republicans’ (and America’s) only hope of ensuring gridlock to put a brake on the Democrats far-left “remaking America” agenda of court-stacking and Constitution shredding is to reelect Sens. Kelly Loeffer and David Perdue. The latest polls show Perdue ahead by 4 points and Loeffler by just over 1 percent, for whatever polls are worth (and after last week, I’d say they’re worth about as much as a counterfeit penny.)

That means that not only will a flood of outside liberal money be pouring into Georgia, but as I mentioned previously, some Democrats plan to pour themselves into the state to quickly establish residency, vote in the runoff, then leave. It’s a dirty, underhanded trick that would steal the voters’ right to choose their own leaders, but again, after last week, do you really think that would deter them? That’s not a bug to them, it’s a feature. That’s why columnist Thomas Friedman of the formerly respected New York Times is actually urging out-of-state Democrats to do it.

It’s not only a slimy and reprehensible move, it’s also illegal under Georgia law to move there just to vote and then leave soon after. That’s considered voter fraud. If you move there just to vote and then leave, you may find yourself staying longer than you expected, in state-provided facilities. I would expect the Democratic Senate candidates, Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, to speak up and denounce this illegal, naked power grab against the real citizens of their state.

Now that the New York Times knows that its columnist is urging readers to engage in illegal vote fraud, I’m sure Friedman will be suspended or fired, right? Oh, wait, I forgot: the New York Times doesn’t recognize the existence of illegal vote fraud.

I’m not urging blue-state Republicans to move to Georgia just to vote, but if you do, I bet you’d want to stay there. However, you can help offset the massive out-of-state money being used to try to buy the seats by contributing to Loeffler and Perdue’s campaigns at these links.

https://secure.winred.com/georgians-for-kelly/donate/

https://secure.winred.com/david-perdue/perdueforsenate


REVERSALS

Joe Biden promised that as President, he would reverse Trump’s agenda, including the things that brought us to record low employment, cheap gas and energy independence, and peace in the Middle East, and he plans to keep those promises, even as he’s already breaking his promise at the first debate not to declare himself President until all the votes are counted and certified. But here’s another reversal of a Trump policy that I doubt will be very popular, even with people who didn’t understand the long-term negative consequences of reversing the others.

Biden’s coronavirus adviser Dr. Zeke Emanuel (the same doctor who helped craft Obamacare and who once said life isn’t worth living beyond age 75, which means he thinks Biden should have died two years ago) not only wants to shut down the economy again, he's also pushing what he calls the “Fair Priority Model” of distributing a vaccine. That means that the nation that develops a vaccine (which I assume will be us) can keep enough to hold the virus transmission rate below 1%, but has to give the rest to other nations. Americans would go without while we’re giving it away to other nations.

So there’s another reversal of a Trump policy: we’d go from “America first” back to “America last.” I guess Trump was right: a lot of voters really did get tired of winning.


November 12, 2020











One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)

THE PATRIOT
 "FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY"

and is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, In God we trust

Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy

Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.



NEVER FORGET THE SACRIFICES
BY OUR VETERANS 

Note: We at The Patriot cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.

The Patriot is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to Educate, protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.

Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.

COMPLAINTS ABOUT OUR GOVERNMENT REGISTERED HERE WHERE THE BUCK STOPS!



GUEST POSTING: WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE PUBLISHED ... DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON YOUR MIND?


Knowledge Is Power - Information Is Liberating: The Patriot Welcome is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.

Big Tech has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you

Please share… Like many other fact-oriented bloggers, we've been exiled from Facebook as well as other "mainstream" social sites. 

We will continue to search for alternative sites, some of which have already been compromised, in order to deliver our message and urge all of those who want facts, not spin and/or censorship, to do so as well.

Keep on seeking the truth, rally your friends and family and expose as much corruption as you can… every little bit helps add pressure on the powers that are no more.



"Yet, while denial might placate those who do not prefer to confront unpleasant facts, truth does not mold itself to the wishes and desires of the willfully ignorant." Unknown  


Those Who Don't Know The True Value Of Loyalty Can Never Appreciate The Cost Of Betrayal.

No comments:

Post a Comment