Facebook and Twitter Become Arbiters of Truth
October 16, 2020, • By Scott BlackburnAfter years of claiming otherwise, Facebook and Twitter have succumbed to partisan pressure and begun openly deciding what is and is not true.
This is the sad result of this week’s dust-up over a New York Post story detailing explosive allegations about Vice President Biden and his son, Hunter.
But that blockbuster October surprise was quickly usurped by the reaction to the story by Facebook and Twitter. Facebook, according to Policy Communications Director Andy Stone, is “reducing its distribution on the platform” pending a fact-check. That means Facebook decided the story was false on its own and is treating it like misinformation. It won’t appear in the most prominent places on Facebook’s platform, including users’ News Feed. Facebook has claimed that its misinformation policies reduce a story’s spread by over 80%.
Not to be outdone, Twitter attempted to eliminate the story by banning users from linking to it, suspending a Trump campaign account attempting to share a video referencing the story, and, for a short time, prohibiting the New York Post itself from using its platform. Twitter’s justification was that the story contained “hacked” materials, but this flimsy explanation was clearly a pretense. Twitter removed the story because it looked, to them, to be false. (Facing significant backlash, Twitter has retreated from this position.)
No matter how you feel about the Post story or about the social media platforms themselves, this is a sad result.
It is futile, stupid, and wrong for these platforms to deliberately slow the spread of a news story because some unnamed person within the company hierarchy has decided that story is false. That is true of any news story, but it’s particularly the case for one concerning a presidential candidate within weeks of the election.
Let’s start with the futility. Facebook and Twitter, despite their size and popularity, cannot control the news. This story was featured in a major American newspaper. And stories about the story, whether supportive or skeptical, were covered in every other newspaper. Those stories were shareable on Facebook and Twitter. And the most-watched news network (Fox News) covered the story in every hour of its programming. The platforms’ lack of control was so obvious that, even after Twitter banned the story, it was, for a time, still trending … on Twitter!
The only thing that Facebook and Twitter managed to do was inject themselves into the story. (This is stupid.) I don’t know if the social media giants are aware, but there have been some ongoing debates about their role in the American political process. The three biggest accusations levied against them are (in no particular order): they have too much power, they are biased against Republicans, and they’ve destroyed traditional news sources. With a single terrible decision, they’ve appeared to confirm all three accusations.
For those of us that believe the critiques of social media are wildly overblown and often just wrong (whether from left or right), this is particularly disheartening. How do you convince a Republican that Facebook or Twitter are not biased when, in the lead up to the Presidential election, they restricted a story critical of the Democratic nominee? How can you convince a progressive that Big Tech does not have too much power over our lives and does not need to be “broken up” when they blew past their own policies and safeguards to prohibit a newspaper from promoting its own reporting? In both instances, it has become much harder.
With these decisions, the likelihood that not just Twitter and Facebook, but all of the internet will be subjected to a political reckoning has become much greater. Free expression on the internet will suffer from such legislation. So will Facebook and Twitter.
But all of that boils down to a more fundamental point. Social media companies have received near-constant pressure to stop misinformation, disinformation, election interference, and fake news. They are haunted by the specter of the 2016 election and the perception (whether fair or not) that lax content moderation policies influenced the result. With a laser-like focus on not making those same mistakes again, they’ve decided to make all new ones.
Facebook set up extensive content moderation networks of humans and computers to enforce rulesets so vast no user can possibly be expected to be aware and comply. They partnered with federal governments to proactively tackle foreign operations, and this, in turn, has metastasized into taking down “inauthentic” domestic operations. They’ve contracted with a network of international fact-checkers to police misinformation. They’ve created ad policies so strict that, in the final week before the election, you are banned from running new political ads. Twitter has its own insipid flavor of all these same policies.
But they’ve forgotten what they are: a place for people to talk to each other. Companies founded in the American spirit of free expression intent on allowing that free expression to expand and flourish the world over.
Somewhere in the morass of bureaucracy, these companies created, this New York Post story tripped a switch that made them act hastily. Perhaps their national security contacts said, “be on the lookout for a false Biden story.” Perhaps people sharing a lot of New York Post content also share a lot of fake news, making the algorithm discount the validity of Post stories. Or maybe a few employees just didn’t like the reporting. If the companies, however, behaved with their overarching strengths and values in mind (at least the ones they allege to have), they would not have acted. And that lack of respect for expression in all of their efforts has cost them here.
This is not to say that social media companies shouldn’t moderate the content. They should! But they should do so with an eye toward their own goal and their own strengths – dialogue, conservation, and expression. That means you shut down vitriolic hate because it shuts down conversations. You block pornography because it’s not something people want to talk about with their friends and family. You stop harassment because it drives people off your platform.
But it is wrong to block a news story about a major party presidential candidate because during election season that’s what everyone wants to talk about.
Social media companies (and often their critics too) act like incendiary political speech that may be false or misleading is a brand-new phenomenon. And that close to an election, voters might hear some news about the candidates that isn’t true. These are age-old problems in a democracy. Facebook and Twitter cannot solve them with a half-baked update to their Community Standards or post-hoc justification for their actions.
Which is why it is wrong to try. Let news organizations debunk bad reports. Let politicians defend themselves against false accusations. Let voters make decisions about the credibility of sources and candidates.
None of these solutions are perfect, but all are better than the faceless judgment of Facebook and Twitter.
The dominant social media companies must choose PUBLISHER OR SOCIAL MEDIA...
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)
THE PATRIOT
"FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY"
and is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, In God we trust
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy
Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
Knowledge Is Power And Information is Liberating: The FRIENDS OF LIBERTY BLOG GROUPS are non-profit blogs dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
NEVER FORGET THE SACRIFICES
BY OUR VETERANS
Note: We at The Patriot cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
COMPLAINTS ABOUT OUR GOVERNMENT REGISTERED HERE WHERE THE BUCK STOPS!
GUEST POSTING: WOULD YOU LIKE TO BE PUBLISHED ... DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON YOUR MIND?
Knowledge Is Power - Information Is Liberating: The Patriot Welcome is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.
Big Tech has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share with your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you
Please share… Like many other fact-oriented bloggers, we've been exiled from Facebook as well as other "mainstream" social sites.
We will continue to search for alternative sites, some of which have already been compromised, in order to deliver our message and urge all of those who want facts, not spin and/or censorship, to do so as well.
Keep on seeking the truth, rally your friends and family and expose as much corruption as you can… every little bit helps add pressure on the powers that are no more.
Keep on seeking the truth, rally your friends and family and expose as much corruption as you can… every little bit helps add pressure on the powers that are no more.
"Yet, while denial might placate those who do not prefer to confront unpleasant facts, truth does not mold itself to the wishes and desires of the
Those Who Don't Know The True Value Of Loyalty Can Never Appreciate The Cost Of Betrayal.
No comments:
Post a Comment