JANETS WORLD:
RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM IDEOLOGY
Our forests are now catastrophically overgrown, often carrying four times the number of trees the land can support. In this stressed and weakened condition, our forests are easy prey for drought, disease, pestilence, and fire.
The United States Forest Service was originally founded to protect forests from the ravages of fire to preserve it for future generations; that thinking was abandoned in favor of the flawed “no-use movement,” or the “rewilding” theory, which blames humans for the “degradation of our planet.” Rewilding the land can repair the damage we’ve caused and reconnect us to the natural world.
For decades, traditional forest management was scientific and successful – that is until ideological, preservationist zealots wormed their way into government and began the 40-year overhaul of sound federal forest management through abuse of the Endangered Species Act and the no-use movement.
Traditional forest management had simple guidelines: thin the forest when it becomes too difficult to walk through; too many trees in the woods will compete with one another because the best trees will grow at a slower rate.
The U.S. Forest Service used to be a profitable federal agency. Up until the mid-1970s, we managed our National Forests according to well-established and time-tested forest management practices. But 40 years ago, we replaced these sound management practices with what can only be described as a doctrine of benign neglect.
Ponderous, Byzantine laws and regulations administered by a growing cadre of ideological zealots in our land management agencies promised to “save the environment.” The advocates of this doctrine have dominated our law, our policies, our courts and our federal agencies ever since.
Today, only privately managed forests are maintained through the traditional forest management practices: thinning, cutting, clearing, prescribed burns, and the disposal of the resulting woody waste.
The forest service used to auction surplus timber harvested from national forests. This served two purposes: 1) clearing, cleaning, and thinning the forest; 2) providing usable timber for a myriad of industries. The timber the forest service auctioned off more than paid for the entire federal agency, and then some. Local governments even received 25 percent of the proceeds of the lumber auctions, while 75 percent went to the federal government.
Revenues that our forest management agencies once produced – and that facilitated our forest stewardship have all but dried up. This has devastated rural communities that once thrived from the forest economy. There were once 147 timber mills; now, there are only 29 in the country.
The growing population, visitation to national forests has declined significantly as the health of our forests has decayed. We can no longer manage lands to prevent fire or even salvage dead timber once the fire has destroyed it. Private forests are still managed properly, but not forests on public lands.
That sound practice grounded to a halt when the most radical environmentalists took over. Now thick, overgrown and diseased forests have become tinderboxes and are burning down in California, leaving a trail of death and destruction.
What Happened?
In 2012, the Obama administration issued a major rewrite of all of the country’s forest rules and guidelines, adding so many rules, regulations and layers of bureaucracy, grounding all forest management to a halt that to even cut one tree down in the national forest, forest managers were forced to apply to the federal government for a study.
The other big problem is these burdensome regulatory requirements greatly inflate the cost of forest management. Between the studies and litigation, the process was endless.
When forest managers attempted to address public lands ravaged by disease, beetles or fires, they were met with a wall of bureaucracy. The laws make it cost prohibitive to salvage.
The Catastrophic Canard of Climate Change
Gov. Jerry Brown has spent a great deal of time jetting around the world spouting climate change propaganda, and now he calls these year-round wildfires California’s “new normal.”
What is obvious is the same climate change impacts private lands as public lands, but private forests are not burning down because they are properly managed. Or if a fire does break out on privately managed forest land, it is often extinguished more quickly and easily because the trees aren’t so close together, and the underbrush has been cleared away.
We are now living with the result of radical environmentalism ideology that we should abandon our public lands to overpopulation, overgrowth, and in essence, benign neglect.
Forest fires, fueled by decades of pent-up overgrowth are now increasing in their frequency and intensity and destruction. Excess timber WILL come out of the forest in one of only two ways. It is either carried out or it burns out.
the legislation was passed last year which streamlined the environmental reviews for the Tahoe Basin. The Forest Service regional manager said it will take their review from 800 pages to 40 pages, and allow them to begin to get the forest there back to a sustainable level.
RADICAL ENVIRONMENTALISM IDEOLOGY
Our forests are now catastrophically overgrown, often carrying four times the number of trees the land can support. In this stressed and weakened condition, our forests are easy prey for drought, disease, pestilence, and fire.
The United States Forest Service was originally founded to protect forests from the ravages of fire to preserve it for future generations; that thinking was abandoned in favor of the flawed “no-use movement,” or the “rewilding” theory, which blames humans for the “degradation of our planet.” Rewilding the land can repair the damage we’ve caused and reconnect us to the natural world.
For decades, traditional forest management was scientific and successful – that is until ideological, preservationist zealots wormed their way into government and began the 40-year overhaul of sound federal forest management through abuse of the Endangered Species Act and the no-use movement.
Traditional forest management had simple guidelines: thin the forest when it becomes too difficult to walk through; too many trees in the woods will compete with one another because the best trees will grow at a slower rate.
The U.S. Forest Service used to be a profitable federal agency. Up until the mid-1970s, we managed our National Forests according to well-established and time-tested forest management practices. But 40 years ago, we replaced these sound management practices with what can only be described as a doctrine of benign neglect.
Ponderous, Byzantine laws and regulations administered by a growing cadre of ideological zealots in our land management agencies promised to “save the environment.” The advocates of this doctrine have dominated our law, our policies, our courts and our federal agencies ever since.
Today, only privately managed forests are maintained through the traditional forest management practices: thinning, cutting, clearing, prescribed burns, and the disposal of the resulting woody waste.
The forest service used to auction surplus timber harvested from national forests. This served two purposes: 1) clearing, cleaning, and thinning the forest; 2) providing usable timber for a myriad of industries. The timber the forest service auctioned off more than paid for the entire federal agency, and then some. Local governments even received 25 percent of the proceeds of the lumber auctions, while 75 percent went to the federal government.
Revenues that our forest management agencies once produced – and that facilitated our forest stewardship have all but dried up. This has devastated rural communities that once thrived from the forest economy. There were once 147 timber mills; now, there are only 29 in the country.
The growing population, visitation to national forests has declined significantly as the health of our forests has decayed. We can no longer manage lands to prevent fire or even salvage dead timber once the fire has destroyed it. Private forests are still managed properly, but not forests on public lands.
That sound practice grounded to a halt when the most radical environmentalists took over. Now thick, overgrown and diseased forests have become tinderboxes and are burning down in California, leaving a trail of death and destruction.
What Happened?
In 2012, the Obama administration issued a major rewrite of all of the country’s forest rules and guidelines, adding so many rules, regulations and layers of bureaucracy, grounding all forest management to a halt that to even cut one tree down in the national forest, forest managers were forced to apply to the federal government for a study.
The other big problem is these burdensome regulatory requirements greatly inflate the cost of forest management. Between the studies and litigation, the process was endless.
When forest managers attempted to address public lands ravaged by disease, beetles or fires, they were met with a wall of bureaucracy. The laws make it cost prohibitive to salvage.
The Catastrophic Canard of Climate Change
Gov. Jerry Brown has spent a great deal of time jetting around the world spouting climate change propaganda, and now he calls these year-round wildfires California’s “new normal.”
What is obvious is the same climate change impacts private lands as public lands, but private forests are not burning down because they are properly managed. Or if a fire does break out on privately managed forest land, it is often extinguished more quickly and easily because the trees aren’t so close together, and the underbrush has been cleared away.
We are now living with the result of radical environmentalism ideology that we should abandon our public lands to overpopulation, overgrowth, and in essence, benign neglect.
Forest fires, fueled by decades of pent-up overgrowth are now increasing in their frequency and intensity and destruction. Excess timber WILL come out of the forest in one of only two ways. It is either carried out or it burns out.
the legislation was passed last year which streamlined the environmental reviews for the Tahoe Basin. The Forest Service regional manager said it will take their review from 800 pages to 40 pages, and allow them to begin to get the forest there back to a sustainable l
By Janet Varney
One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. -- Plato (429-347 BC)
TRY THE PATRIOT AD FREE
"FIGHTING FOR FREEDOM AND LIBERTY"
and is protected speech pursuant to the "unalienable rights" of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, In God we trust
Stand Up To Government Corruption and Hypocrisy
NEVER FORGET THE SACRIFICES
BY OUR VETERANS Note: We at The Patriot cannot make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information.
Don't forget to follow the Friends Of Liberty on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest, Twitter, Tumblr and Google Plus PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
LibertygroupFreedom 
The Patriot is a non-partisan, non-profit organization with the mission to Educate, protect and defend individual freedoms and individual rights.
Support the Trump Presidency and help us fight Liberal Media Bias. Please LIKE and SHARE this story on Facebook or Twitter.
WE THE PEOPLE
TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Join The Resistance and Share This Article Now!
TOGETHER WE WILL MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Help us spread the word about THE PATRIOT Blog we're reaching millions help us reach millions more.
Help us spread the word about THE PATRIOT Blog we're reaching millions help us reach millions more.
No comments:
Post a Comment